A failed review of CCE site inspection standards and processes

"The question for us as bona fide educational researchers, is why did one of the four CCEs trust the authors and agree to fully participate while the other 3 did not? We suspect that cultural differences may be one factor as the positively responding CCE already transparently publishes inspection team reports on their website. It is also possible that there are differences between the composition of the CCEs executives that influence the willingness to subject themselves to scrutiny with the possibility of having to change and improve. Those who argue in favour of such transparency believe the public and students have a right in a democratic society to know of educational practice standards [29]. They also argue that the possibility of positive reports motivates educational programs to strive to improve themselves and increase their marketability [26, 28]."
A failed review of CCE site inspection standards and processes

#science #chiropractor #chiropractic #research #education #evidence based #patient centered #interprofessional #collaborative #rehabilitation #public health #spinal health #musculoskeletal health #ethics #pain #function #disability #QOL

Facebook Comments

Join over 12,000 Evidence-Based Chiropractors across the globe (world) in our thriving Facebook community – where knowledge, collaboration, and growth come together!

Donate

If you enjoy our content, please feel free to buy us a cup of coffee! We are grateful for your support of science-based spine care.

Research Posts

World Spine Care in Botswana

A Beginners Guide to Evidence-Based Chiropractic Clinical Practice

Research Week in Review: 21st – 26th October

Evidence based chiropractic care advances in the Philippines

Get in Touch

WE'D LOVE TO HEAR FROM YOU

© Evidence-Based Chiropractic Network All rights reserved.