Prognostic accuracy of clinicians for back, neck and shoulder patients in routine practice

Prognostic accuracy of clinicians for back, neck and shoulder patients in routine practice In this study chiropractors were found not to be able to accurately predict treatment outcomes of patients prior to treatment at 1 or 3 months follow up, for any of the conditions, chronicity of condition and regardless of the use of multiple measures to determine outcome. The results of this study imply that practitioners insight into a patients likely outcome is not sufficient alone as a prognostic tool. Given the controversy inherent in the prediction literature to define robust predictors of prognosis it maybe that barring generic factors such as duration it will remain up to the practitioner to do their best in how they articulate potential prognosis to the patient. Luckily given that most MSD patients tend to improve in the relatively short term erring on the side of optimism may be the best policy.

#science #chiropractor #chiropractic #research #education #evidence based #patient centered #interprofessional #collaborative #rehabilitation #public health #spinal health #musculoskeletal health #ethics #pain #function #disability #QOL #knowledgetranslation

Facebook Comments

Join over 12,000 Evidence-Based Chiropractors across the globe (world) in our thriving Facebook community – where knowledge, collaboration, and growth come together!

Donate

If you enjoy our content, please feel free to buy us a cup of coffee! We are grateful for your support of science-based spine care.

Research Posts

World Spine Care in Botswana

A Beginners Guide to Evidence-Based Chiropractic Clinical Practice

Research Week in Review: 21st – 26th October

Evidence based chiropractic care advances in the Philippines

Get in Touch

WE'D LOVE TO HEAR FROM YOU

© Evidence-Based Chiropractic Network All rights reserved.